Tuesday, 2 February 2016

Fayose urges Buhari to respect independence of judiciary

Fayose urges Buhari to respect independence of judiciary


– Governor Ayodele Fayose has President Muhammadu Buhari not to interfere with the workings of the judiciary
– He says the Buhari has not disclose why he allegedly hate the judiciary
– He warns against giving the judiciary a ‘bad’ name in war on graft

Ekiti state governor, Ayodele Fayose, has called on President Muhammadu Buhari to respect the principles of separation of powers by allowing the judiciary to carry out its jobs in proper prosecution of people accused of corruption.
The governor asked the president to stop making the judiciary looks as the stumbling block in his anti-graft fight.
Fayose gave this advice in a statement release on Monday, February 1, by his spokesman, Lere Olayinka, urging the president to tell Nigerians the truth on the war against Boko Haram, Vanguard reports.

He said: “They keep telling us that they have defeated Boko Haram technically while Nigerians are still being killed daily by Boko Haram, with over 100 people killed in Dalori, less than 12km to Maiduguri, Borno State capital.

“Isn’t it now necessary for the President to fulfill his promise of leading from the front and getting his Information Minister, Lai Mohammed to go and hold a press briefing in Sambisa forest unguarded by military men so as to show to Nigerians that indeed, they have defeated Boko Haram technically?”
The governor said that Buhari should have simply tell Nigerians that he hated the Nigerian Judiciary because he lost his petitions that he filed against his electoral defeats in 2003, 2007 and 2011 , instead of hiding under the fight against corruption to ventilate his anger.
The governor, who said there was nothing wrong with the legal system in Nigeria, saying that “in recent times, politicians like President Buhari are the ones responsible for the rot in the judiciary because of their desperation to use the courts to foist one party state on Nigerians with conflicting judgments from election tribunals.”

Why Father Mbaka was transfered – Catholic church reveals

Why Father Mbaka was transfered – Catholic church reveals

– The Catholic church reveals why it transferred Reverend father Mbaka.
– Reverend father Mbaka has been transfarred to another parish.
– The church says the transfer was politically motivated.
Father Ejike Mbaka, Vice President Yemi Osinbajo and President Muhammdu Buhari at the state house.

The Catholic Church on Monday, February 1, explained why it recently transferred, prominent Catholic cleric, Reverend father Ejike Mbaka, of the Enugu-based Adoration Ministry.

The church in a swift reaction, said Mbaka’s transfer was not politically motivated as claimed by some people.

The Enugu parish leadership had reportedly transferred the fire-brand cleric from Christ the King Parish in the Government Reserved Area (GRA) of the state to Our Lady Parish, Emene, a suburb of the state.

Reverend Father Ralph Madu, the Secretary-General of the Catholic Secretar‎iat of Nigeria, dislosed this in an interview with Premium Times.

He said transfer of priests within the Catholic Church is a “normal church procedure.”
The cleric said: “Mbaka’s own is not an exception. The Bishop has the right to post any priest wherever he feels his service would be more useful to the church.”

Mbaka in his farewell speech admitted that he was going to suffer in his new place of assignment.
The South-East zone of the All Progressives Congress (APC) has alleged that Bishop Callistus Onaga was manipulated by external forces into effecting Mbaka’s transfer.

RMadu in reaction said “such frivolities ‎have nothing to do with the posting.”

He added that his posting should have been a privilege, not a punishment.

The cleric further said: “If he (Mbaka) says it’s a punishment, then it’s open for further investigation. Posting is a regular thing, a priest can be transferred after two, three, four, or more years, it depends on the discretion of the Bishop.

He is supposed to be a missionary. “What if the Bishop had closed down the ministry‎, which is within his power to do? Sometimes, transfers can be for the good of the priest as something can be going wrong which he might not be aware of. The Bishop is free to move any priest at any time, it is his prerogative.”

Islamic State enticing Nigerians with $1000 recruitment bonus

Islamic State enticing Nigerians with $1000 recruitment bonus

 – UK newspaper The Daily Telegraph reports on Islamic State’s efforts to recruit sub-Saharan Africans.
 – The terror group is offering $1000 to impoverished Africans to entice them to jihadism in Libya.
 – Libyan officials say there is very little they can do to stem the tide of Islamist fighters.
The Islamic State is building an “army of the poor” in its new haven in Libya by recruiting foot soldiers from Africa’s poorest communities, The Daily Telegraph has reported.

The terror group’s Libyan chapter is swelling its ranks by offering cash bounties of up to $1,000 to people from neighbouring countries such as Chad, Mali, Nigeria and Sudan.

Libyan officials admit that they are almost powerless to stop the incomers, many of whom reach Libya using existing people-smuggling routes used by African migrants heading to Europe.

Islamic State is copying a strategy first used by Libya’s late dictator, Colonel Gaddafi, who recruited thousands of mercenaries from black Africa to serve in his armies.

In much the same way, the Islamic State’s new “Caliphate” in Colonel Gaddafi’s home city of Sirte now has a growing number of black African fighters.

Colonel Muncif al Walda, a senior police officer in the nearby city of Misrata, said: “Illegal immigration is a menace because it brings and encourages foreign fighters to come and fight with Isil.
“Most of the migrants want to go to Europe, but some want to link up with Islamic State. Unfortunately, here in Libya we are right in the middle of the migration rat run.”

Since first establishing a foothold in Sirte a year ago, Islamic State is believed to have built up an army of between 2,000 and 3,000 fighters, turning the port city into a Libyan version of the group’s Syrian stronghold of Raqqah.

Colonel Ismail Shukri, the head of military intelligence in Misrata, said around 70% of the Islamic State army in Sirte was made up of non-Libyans.

“The majority – I cannot tell you exactly how many – are Tunisians, while the rest are made up mostly of Sudanese, Egyptians and then people from the Sub-Saharan countries stretching from Chad and Nigeria, along with a few from Algeria and the Gulf,” he said.

Jamal Zubia, head of the foreign media directorate in Libya’s General National Congress, added: “We hear that Isil is offering people up to $1,000 to come and fight for them. That is a lot of money in many parts of Africa.”
Islamic State fighter, believe to be from Sudan, praises the execution of a ‘witch’

Locals in Sirte say that sub-Saharan Africans are now a common sight among Isil’s volunteers.
In April last year, a man described as Sudanese drove an explosive-laden vehicle into a checkpoint between Sirte and Misrata, killing at least six people.

Pictures of other black Africans killed in action fighting for Islamic State in Sirte have also appeared on Libyan social media.

Others appear to play a prominent role as Isil cheerleaders.

In one recent Isil video showing a homeopathist publicly beheaded for “witchcraft” in Sirte, a black African is prominent among a crowd of onlookers who clap and sing praises.

“This is what we want, this is the just law that has been missing all along,” the jihadist said.

Presidency Defends Buhari’s Frequent Travels

Presidency Defends Buhari’s Frequent Travels


– Presidency has defended President Muhammadu Buhari’s frequent foreign trips
–  It says Buhari’s trips were for the betterment of Nigeria
– It also dismisses insinuations that the foreign trips embarked on by the president were mere jamborees 

The presidency has reacted to the insinuation that President Muhammadu Buhari’s frequent oversea trips were mere jamborees.

The senior special assistant to Buhari on media and publicity, Garba Shehu told reporters at the State House that the foreign trips were necessitated by the president desire to block and recover funds looted out of Nigeria, The Punch reports.

Already, the president had travel to France and Britain and only return from Kenya and Ethiopia last week.

Buhari’s spokesman said that it would be wrong to describe the president foreign as jamboree.
He highlighted the gains of the president’s foreign  trips to include the securing of agreement with various countries on recovery and repatriation of stolen funds.

Shhu pointed out that part of the arrangement was that some stop security officials would travel next week to United Arab Emirates to further actualize an agreement on recovery and repatriation of stolen funds.
He said: “You also see gradually the strategic efforts to go after the stolen funds abroad. The UAE is very important to the country.

“Don’t be surprised that in the coming week or two, you will see high level security officials leaving Nigeria for the UAE to begin to give expression to our wish to enjoy this new cooperation between the two countries with a view to recovering stolen assets.

“There are numerous agreements we have also signed with them; drugs, human trafficking and stolen assets that have been stolen abroad.

Senate Questions Ministry Of Education’s 10 billion Naira increased Budget

Senate Questions Ministry Of Education’s 10 billion Naira increased Budget


The Senate has queried a 10 billion Naira increase in the 2016 Budget proposal of parastatals in the education sector.
 
Legislators at the upper House made the inquiry on Monday during a budget defence session at the National Assembly in Abuja, Nigeria’s capital.
 
The committee also expressed concern over personnel proposals of institutions including unity schools and universities, which were reduced.

In the 2016 budget breakdown, the education sector got the highest figures, a development that had been commended, as the nation’s education system needed to be reformed.
 
 
The Senate Committee on Tertiary Institutions questioned why 98.1 billion Naira was budgeted for education parastatals in the 2016 budget proposal.

BIAFRA: KANU NAMED PRISONER OF CONSCIENCE BY RIGHTS GROUP

BIAFRA: KANU NAMED PRISONER OF CONSCIENCE BY RIGHTS GROUP


In a press statement issued yesterday in Onitsha, Anambra state, SBCHROs said that for the fact that  Nnamdi Kanu has never killed anybody, used violence, advocated for violence or authorized anybody or group to kill, Kanu eminently deserves the local and international status of a prisoner-of-conscience.

The statement
In the statement entitled: “SBCHROs Names Nnamdi Kanu-A Prisoner-Of-Conscience On Account Of His Continued Persecution By Buhari & Bail Denial By Justice John Tsoho”, the group further stated that  for the fact that he was arrested and detained for 98 days without  trial contrary to Sections 35 (4) (a) (right to personal liberty), 33 (right to life), 34 (right to dignity of human person), 36 (right to fair hearing) and 41 (right to freedom of movement) of the 1999 Constitution and Articles V,VI,VII and XII of the African Charter on Human & Peoples Rights (ratified and domesticated by Nigeria in 1983) and for the fact that  the Nigerian authorities led by President Muhammadu Buhari have flouted with impunity and reckless abandon, several court decisions bordering on protection and enforcement of these constitutional rights of the detained Prisoner-of-Conscience; Kanu should now be addressed as so.

Arrest politically motivated
Director of Radio Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, sandwiched between security operaives, leaving the court.
According to the statement, “For the fact that  Nnamdi Kanu’s arrest and detention was politically motivated and ill-conceived; for the fact that he was arrested and detained and is being persecuted for his non violent political and social thoughts and for the fact that the mind of the trial Judge, Hon Justice John Tsoho was possibly abused, biased and corrupted presidentially, leading to the Judge convicting him even before trial (his choice of words); upon which he was denied his long awaited and deserved bail; he should henceforth be called prisoner of conscience.”

The statement further declared: “For the purpose of refreshing the minds  of all and sundry particularly the Nigerian democratic forces, Prisoner of Conscience, POC is a term coined by Peter Benenson; founder of Amnesty International, UK  in his May 28, 1961 article “the Forgotten Prisoners,” published in the London ObserverNewspaper. The term refers to anyone imprisoned because of their race, sexual orientation, religion, or political views expressed or conducted non-violently or in peaceful manners.

“It also refers to those who have been imprisoned and/or persecuted for non-violent expression of their conscientiously held beliefs. Amnesty International, UK regards prisoners of conscience as political and activist prisoners (non white collar or street criminal suspects) or jailed international or national citizens who have been jailed or imprisoned by repressive and suppressive political authorities because of their political, religious or other conscientiously-held beliefs, ethnic origin, sex, colour, language, national or social origin, economic status, birth, sexual orientation or other status, provided that they are non violent and peaceful and have never sanctioned the opposite.

“Beyond naming Kanu a prisoner-of-conscience; plans by SBCHROsare also on the way to formally write and appeal to the likes of Amnesty International, UK, the Human Rights Watch, USA and the Society for the Threatened People, Germany, etc to also adopt Nnamdi Kanu as a prisoner-of-conscience or be given or accorded with equivalent status.

“As SBCHROs’ prisoner-of-conscience, Nnamdi Kanu will remain under our local, national and global campaign searchlight until he is freed, discharged and acquitted of the ongoing phantom charge of treasonable felony”.

We remain committed—MASSOB
Similarly, the Movement for the Actualization of the Sovereign State of Biafra, MASSOB, yesterday, reaffirmed its commitment to stay  focused  on the struggle for Biafra secession not minding the distractions meant to whittle down the outcome.

The pro-Biafra group was reacting to a comment credited to Rabiu Kaugama representing Madori/Kaugama Federal Constituency of Jigawa State wherein he alleged that Biafran agitators have abandoned the struggle and surrendered to President Muhammad Buhari.

In a statement by MASSOB leader, Uchenna Madu and made available to newsmen in Enugu,the Biafra activists warned that it will not be cowed or weakened by sponsored utterances of some northern leaders adding that the over 17 years struggle cannot be jettisoned on the altar of partisanship.

According to Madu, ”our struggle has yeilded much unprecedented and overwhelming diplomatic success and international sympathy/recognition; a struggle of survival that members have willingly and consciously sacrificed their lives and are willing to pay more prices.

Non-violence Biafra struggle
“MASSOB has made it clear uncountable times that no amount of external falsehood, intimidative utterances and campaign of negative impressions will ever deter us from the non-violence Biafra struggle. MASSOB under my leadership will never be detered or shaken because of baseless allegations of compromising the Biafra struggle. We are aware that our detractors/blackmailers are not comfortable with MASSOB new reformation and global recognition.

“We will continue to partner with IPOB and other pro-Biafra groups to actualize the struggle.”

Group draws Obama’s attention to human rights abuses in Nigeria

Group draws Obama’s attention to human rights abuses in Nigeria

Group draws Obama's attention to human rights abuses in Nigeria
A group under the aegis of People for the Defence of Human Rights in Nigeria (PDHRN) has called on President Barack Obama and other world leaders to reverse what they de­scribe as human rights violation of the Nigeria government led by President Muhammadu Buhari.
 
The group cited recent detention of some persons perceived to be opposed to the APC government in the guise of anti-corruption crusade. The develop­ment, the group said, should be a source of worry to all lovers of democracy in Nigeria, while calling on the interna­tional communities to save Nigeria’s de­mocracy from total collapse.
 
In a letter signed by the group coordi­nator, Prince Shield Nnwanzurahu and made available to The AUTHORITY in Abuja, the group accused President Muhammad Buhari’s administration of clear cases of selective persecution, and violation of citizens’ rights.